Big Ten Wonk
Tuesday, November 01, 2005
 
Effective FG pct. (eFG pct.--scroll down for 2005 figures)
eFG pct. = (FGM + (0.5 x 3PM))/FGA

About this stat....
A straight field goal percentage is fine as far as it goes (better than rebounds-per-game, certainly) but, since the advent of the three-point shot, it’s less informative than the following:

Effective FG pct. = (FGM + (0.5 x 3PM))/FGA

For instance—Illinois ranked second in the Big Ten last year in straight FG pct. in conference play:

Michigan State: .498 (431/866)
Illinois: .485 (432/890)

But, of course, the Illini attempted many more three point shots (351) than did the Spartans (283) and, as the old saying goes, making a third of your three-pointers is just as good as making half your two-pointers.

So the fact that Illinois shot .013 lower from the field than did Michigan State is misleading when unaccompanied by the additional fact that Bruce Weber’s team sank a very healthy share of those three-pointers:

Illinois eFG pct. = (432 + (0.5 x 145))/890 = (432 + 72.5)/890 = 504.5/890 = .567
Michigan State eFG pct. = (431 + (0.5 x 93))/866 = (431 + 46.5)/866 = 477.5/866 = .551

An eFG pct. merely recognizes mathematical reality: a made three-pointer is worth 0.5 more than a made two-pointer. Using a straight FG pct. in the presence of the three-point shot, then, is roughly analogous to calculating a batting average using plate appearances instead of official at-bats.

2005, conference games only
1. Illinois (.567)
2. Michigan State (.551)
3. Northwestern (.544)
4. Indiana (.520)
5. Wisconsin (.515)
6. Ohio State (.501)
7. Iowa (.494)
8. Michigan (.490)
9. Purdue (.482)
10. Minnesota (.455)
11. Penn State (.442)

Opponent eFG pct.
1. Minnesota (.473)
2. Ohio State (.480)
3. Iowa (.482)
4. Indiana (.484)
5. Wisconsin (.491)
6. Illinois (.496)
7. Michigan State (.497)
8. Purdue (.510)
9. Michigan (.521)
10. Penn State (.561)
11. Northwestern (.565)

 


<< Home



wonk back!
email me


a very special wonk
the blog's final days


basics
me, simmons, and 150 million other american males
the four dullest topics for a hoops blog
drama, magnitude, and finality
2007 "power"-conference velocity report
special report: in tedium's path
stop DAD: defensive attention deficit
consistency, threes, and stereotypes
they shoot free throws, don't they?
every rebound needs an adjective
fouls: call fewer or allow more
was norman dale wrong?
what's PPWS?
POT: perimeter-oriented team
symphony of altruists
mammalian theory of extreme home-court advantage
law of november weight change
scoring and preventing points: how to


tempo-free aerials
(conf. games only)
acc
big east
big ten
big XII
pac-10
sec


geek chorus
intro to tempo-free stats
2007 big ten team tempo-free stats
2006 big ten team tempo-free stats
2005 big ten team tempo-free stats
state of the stats, april '06


canonical bloggers
yoni cohen
ken pomeroy
kyle whelliston
ryan kobliska
chris west
brian cook


November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
August 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
August 2006
September 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
October 2007